US-China: What's Really At Stake In London

Latest stories

Eternal Queen of Asian Pop's last encore from beyond the grave

​Time to put Elon Musk back to work fixing weapons manufacturing

The tiny Philippine island denying and defying China at sea

Under Trump, the US is doubling down on strategic protectionism. The re-imposition of sweeping“Liberation Day” tariffs in April was not an isolated action-it was the next phase in a broader effort to reshape American economic exposure.

China, under President Xi Jinping, is responding in kind by accelerating self-reliance campaigns, boosting its military-industrial complex and tightening control over capital flows and foreign technology.

The two economic giants are hurtling toward a split system of parallel supply chains, competing standards, rival digital currencies and mutually exclusive rules for artificial intelligence. The old model-interdependence through globalization-is unraveling in real time.

From a market perspective, this fracturing introduces volatility but also extraordinary opportunity. Strategic sectors are being rapidly repriced.

Defense tech, AI, cybersecurity, semiconductor manufacturing and rare earths have all emerged as proxies in this economic power contest.

Recent capital flows tell the story: US and European investors are ramping up exposure to domestic chip production, while China is injecting vast state funding into its own tech champions and weaponizing industrial policy.

Just last week, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced a new 500 billion yuan (US$69 billion) investment initiative focused on dual-use technologies-those with both civilian and military applications.

Simultaneously, the US Commerce Department expanded its export restrictions to cover quantum computing components and AI training data sets. The message from both sides is unmistakable: dominance in tomorrow's tech is national security today.

The London talks, then, a theater where the future is being negotiated-or not. With US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer facing off against China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, these are the most senior discussions since the Geneva reset.

Both capitals know what's at stake, and neither wants to look like it's blinking.

Investors are caught in a strange double bind: exposed to the risks of fragmentation, but positioned to benefit from the rush to secure the commanding heights of the future economy. That's why the London talks are being watched as closely in corporate boardrooms as in diplomatic circles.

If the talks succeed in holding the Geneva line, it could stabilize sentiment and breathe life into cross-border dealmaking that's been paralyzed by policy uncertainty.

If they fail-and signs point to fundamental misalignments in trust and expectation-then the decoupling will accelerate. Supply chains shift faster, capital reallocates at scale and inflation risks in key inputs like semiconductors and rare earths will spike again.

Investors will need to think in terms of dual portfolios: one optimized for the Western bloc, the other for the Chinese sphere of influence.

However, there is another, deeper implication that should not be overlooked. The current rivalry is not just about GDP or tech leadership; it's about two economic visions vying for legitimacy.